Isabel Cooper’s work with the muralist Ezra Winter

This entry is post 18 of 21 in the ongoing series Isabel Cooper

As a boy, I spent a lot of time with my grandmother, Isabel Cooper. She was fascinating. Before marrying, she lived an independent, adventurous life, too rare for women born in the 1890s.

Among hundreds of stories I heard, she told me about her time working “above the ceiling” in Grand Central Terminal in New York City.

Grand Central interior, with its ceiling depicting constellations1)By Sracer357 – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=21753225

Isabel was a painter, an atelier-trained artist who had worked in scientific illustration and decorative arts. In the late 1920s, she took a job working for the mural painter, Ezra Winter. His studio was in Grand Central Terminal.

Winter designed large-format murals for public spaces, and had a team of artists executing his designs. His murals are at Radio City Music Hall, and the US Chamber of Commerce and the Library of Congress reading room in Washington, DC, among other places.

In her eighties, Isabel relished remembering her time at the studio. A favorite story was about a “funny little man” who darted through the studio from time to time. He would cross the artists’ work area, and pop through a small door at the other end. One day, one of the artists stopped him and asked what he was up to. “Why I’m the star lighter,” he said.

In the early 1930s, an un-named correspondent wrote The New Yorker and told the same story. I wonder if it was Isabel.2)Morris Bishop, Charles Cooke, and Robert M. Coates, “Twinkle, Twinkle,” Talk of the Town, The New Yorker, December 23, 1933, pp. 9-10.

In the 1920s, Grand Central Terminal had a map of the heavens painted on its barrel-vaulted ceiling above the main concourse. Sixty ten-watt light bulbs lit the prominent stars in the constellations it depicted. (A restored version of the night-sky ceiling is still there. Through a design error, the entire sky view is the reverse of the actual night sky.)

Somebody had to change burned-out light bulbs. Isabel’s “funny little man” had the job. There are still lights in the ceiling; the bulbs are now LEDs.

Note: Isabel’s stories often involved funny little men.

Working for Ezra Winter

By the late 1920s, Ezra Winter was getting big commissions for murals in public buildings, bank lobbies, and elsewhere, and was growing his staff. He was close friends with naturalist and scientific expedition leader William Beebe, for whom Isabel had long worked on expeditions to South America. She must have known of Ezra Winter through that connection. He offered Isabel work in his studio.

By 1926, when she went to work for Winter, Isabel had met Charles D. Mahaffie, her future husband. My guess is she no longer wanted to leave the country for months at a time on William Beebe’s scientific expeditions, which she had done since 1917.

Work in New York City best suited her new situation, Charles, who lived in Washington, DC, was only a train ride away.

Ezra Winter, undated photo3)National Park Service, https://www.nps.gov/people/ezra-winter.htm

Winter’s studio, where he employed a dozen or more artists, was high above the concourse in Grand Central Terminal, though not quite “above the ceiling”.

His attic space was large and had tall, arched windows that let in plenty of light. It had high ceilings that fit canvases of 20 by 40 feet. It sat near the level of the vaulted ceiling of the station, with its painted sky.

A cutaway diagram of Grand Central, showing the space (top right) where Ezra Winter had his studio4)By New York Central Railroad (No author, publisher, or copyright listed) – “The Gateway to a Continent; Grand Central Zone”GRAND CENTRAL TERMINAL, NEW YORK.Pictorial profile of Grand Central Terminal, the office buildings, apartment buildings, and hotels within the Grand Central Zone which is located from 42nd Street to 51st Street between Madison and Lexington Avenues in New York City. 36pp. 4to (New York, 1939). First Edition.The Cooper Collection of Transportation History (private collection), Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47214055

The right kind of artists mattered to Ezra Winter

In a speech to the Mural Painters Society in 1932 or 19335)Typescript of the speech, Ezra Winter Collection, Archive of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, p. 22., Winter talked about how he operated his studio. He commented that union painters tended to have work that was too standardized or too stylized. But, he said:

Among the non-union assistants which I did use in my studio I have always found them so individualized in the character of their work that I could depend on them to do only certain things the way I wished to have them done.

What I am trying to bring out is that artists are all so highly and intensely individual and it is so good and healthy for them to be that way that any attempt at standardization of their work or their time or any outside control is bound to be a hindrance and a handicap to their work.

Isabel’s work for William Beebe, executing scientific illustrations of animals, showed spark and wit. Her animals had personality (see her rendering of a king vulture, below). Winter had probably already seen her work and noticed its qualities when he sought to bring her into his operation. Beebe also had reported on how hard Isabel worked during his expeditions.6)Review of various expedition journals at the William Beebe archive, Princeton University Special Collections He may have recommended her to Ezra Winter as a talented and efficient staffer.

An illustration of a king vulture by Isabel Cooper7)from the author’s collection

The Ezra Winter studio payroll records at the Archive of American Art span 1933-36, which is a period after Isabel no longer worked for him. They show he paid his staff artists between $25 to $60 per week.8)Review of unpublished records in the Ezra Winter Collection, Archive of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. But Isabel wrote in a letter to Charles Mahaffie (see below) that she “worked on time” for Ezra Winter, and was able to mix work for him with other projects. She earned $1,200 at Winter’s studio in 1927, as reflected in her tax return.9)Tax document in the author’s family archives. I don’t have records to show how many weeks of 1927 she worked in the studio.

That year, she also earned $900 from the Encyclopedia Britannica for illustration work, $2100 from the American Museum of Natural History, (for her murals and diagrams for their exhibits), and $1400 for miscellaneous decorating commissions. Her income in 1927 was $6,000. That equates to an estimated $113,859 in 2026.10)using the calculator here: https://smartasset.com/investing/inflation-calculator

A “haven for giddy frolic”

A biographical series of articles by Jessica Helfand on Ezra Winter in the Design Observer relate that Winter and the naturalist William Beebe were close pals. They used Winter’s Grand Central studio for parties.

With his pals Bill (William Chadbourne, a lawyer) and Will (the zoologist William Beebe) Winter soon transformed his studio into a haven for giddy frolic. The parties became a palpable means of escape for the serious painter — a place to dance and dress up, to flirt and cavort and forget, for a few hours, about all the pressing obligations that otherwise circumscribed his days. These soirées proved a kind of temporary escape, a respite from ordinary life to the extraordinary world of make-believe.11)Jessica Helfand, “Ezra Winter Project, Chapter Six,” Design Observer, June 1, 2012, https://designobserver.com/ezra-winter-project-chapter-six/

Winter’s studio, and his fame, brought lots of people to visit, including for regular costume parties. The landlord, owner of The New York Central Railroad, took issue with Winter’s use of the space for parties and for his use of it as an apartment. He denied having more than the rare party there, and claimed he only slept in the studio over night occasionally when he worked late. But even the gossip columns noted he had an apartment there.12)From various newspaper gossip items and articles, and a review of the Winter archive at the Smithsonian Institution.

For key commissions, Winter turned to Isabel

Section of Ezra Winter mural US LOC Reading Room13)Highsmith, Carol M, photographer. North Reading Room, west wall. Detail of mural by Ezra Winter illustrating the characters in the Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer. Library of Congress John Adams Building, Washington, D.C. Photograph. Retrieved from the Library of Congress, www.loc.gov/item/2007687083/

Isabel proved her skills to Winter. He gave her work to do developing his concepts for mural scenes from his rough sketches through final painting and installation.

Among the projects where she did substantial work were the Willard Straight Hall at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, and the Birmingham Public Library, Birmingham, Alabama.

Isabel and colleagues developed Winter’s sketched designs for those installations into complete murals. He trusted key staff, including Isabel, to flesh them out into complete murals. Below is a scene she worked at Cornell based on Winter’s instructions. She described the Cornell assignment in a letter to Charles Mahaffie in 1926:

You are perhaps wondering just what the dickens I do. Well, this morning, for instance, the inarticulate creature showed me a vast expanse of blankness, about ten feet square, and said to sketch up full-size an intelligent-looking Chinaman, a pile of treasure, and a black tiger, and ease them gently into each other with some inoffensive-looking shrubbery etc. Idea of the group: ‘wisdom and wealth.14)Letter from Isabel Cooper to Charles D. Mahaffie, March 1, 1926

Mural by Ezra Winter, executed by Isabel Cooper, at Willard Straight Hall, Cornell University15)postcard in author’s collection

More in Isabel’s words about this work and Ezra Winter, excerpted below, comes from letters she wrote to Charles between 1925 and 1926. They give a flavor of what she thought of the work, and of Winter.

________________________________

Isabel Cooper writing about Ezra Winter and her work for him, 1925-1926

Isabel lived in Manhattan (and also traveled with the William Beebe expedition for about seven months in 1926). She exchanged several letters a week with the man she married a few years later, Charles D. Mahaffie, who lived in Washington, DC.

Below are quotes from Isabel’s letters to Charles Mahaffie that are about Ezra Winter.

December 1, 1925

Tonight I am going to the ‘varnishing’ of the Centennial Exhibition of the Academy with my favorite mural painter, a lanky, vague, artistic, and amazingly capable creature.

Later that night Isabel added:

An assorted crew floated back to the capable mural-painter’s for coffee. Stayed well on into this morning, having the kind of talk which gets nowhere and you can’t remember what it was all about, but the fact remains it was a very jolly slice of talk all the same.

She went on about Ezra Winter:

Mural-painter, the complete host, never says a word, but just shoves edibles and smokes etc. around and looks at you (and probably others as well) as if you were the only person in the room. Nice simple way to please every one. . .

February 3, 1926

By later that winter she was in Winter’s sights as a someone he wanted working for him. She wrote to Charles:

I had planned to work hard as anything in the days and go to the theater every night for the next few weeks, but it now transpires that the nice Winter person . . . being duly impressed with my junk in the architectural show, wants me to plunge into some stupendous decoration job with him, for as long as I want to work at it. Murals, I believe, with a great deal of detail, at which I shall be put. Rather interesting for a while, so I shall shove my own work into the evenings and my reading into the smallest hours and my numerous demanding friends into meal hours.

February 12, 1926

My job is pretty good. I run up and down ladders etc. The murals are about 40 by 20 feet. It is fine to have the ladders. They get you out of the cold draughts. It is a most diverting place, with a variety of persons working at a diversity of things, and odd lots of musicians barging in and out and playing mostly very well on a very beautiful piano which hasn’t got rheumatism yet from the ventilation.

Job has the advantage of being flexible. I work on time, so that I can adapt it to my other activities rather well. Am managing better than you might suppose with my busy life.

February 17, 1926

Am starting some color work on the sketches for the murals, and what do you suppose they use for a medium? A pestilential mixture, dating from the Renaissance period, of raw eggs and vinegar and varnish, all nicely merged with the paint to make it stick or something.

March 1, 1926

A few weeks later, she wrote:

My odd job still interests me. The mural painter is really quite a person. One sees how he came to take the Prix de Rome. He has mastered the art of working hard, and appears to know exactly what he is about. But he can’t explain in words how he wants things done. Lots of men are like that, so I think up out my head what he wants, and then when he comes round and says how nicely I have caught his idea, I merely look duplex and docile.

You are perhaps wondering just what the dickens I do. Well, this morning, for instance, the inarticulate creature showed me a vast expanse of blankness, about ten feet square, and said to sketch up full-size an intelligent-looking Chinaman, a pile of treasure, and a black tiger, and ease them gently into each other with some inoffensive-looking shrubbery etc. Idea of the group: ‘wisdom and wealth.

And I discovered in some delightful archaic literature (the man has a really wonderful art reference library) confirmation of the use of a black tiger guarding treasure—ancient Chinese symbol of wealth.

You understand that the symbolism in murals is always very fatuous, but by the time the thing is all done and up on the wall 90 percent of the people passing it never see it, and the other 10 merely receive an impression of a jolly pattern of colors and lines and let it go at that. So the artist and his assistants can amuse themselves with the ideas to be portrayed, with the additional comfort of knowing that probably no one will ever come forward with criticisms.

The work on these enormous sketches is really rather a lark, particularly so because they leave me alone and let me mess along by myself. And the studio is a most amusing place. Several of my friends who are thoroughly “grata” with the boss have taken to dropping in to chat with me, having discovered that I am never comfortably at home any more. Some of them come and play on the piano by the hour, which is nice. Better than the tinned music which the German draughtsman keeps going.

March 30, 1926

A particular Ezra Winter commission she worked on was for Cornell University. On March 30, 1926, she wrote Charles:

Did ten hours straight at the studio yesterday and today. Am still engaged up on the drawings for the memorial at Cornell. A very hard job, and getting harder and more interesting all the time. My boss is very calm and unruffled about his work, and turns overall all sorts of stuff to me without reflecting that perhaps I am not perfectly adapted to carry it out. So it us up to me to make good regardless. Am now working on a group of Chinese having a chat with a sort of glorified Marco Polo in a grove of brilliant trees, with a mountain range in the back ground. And what sort of occupation is that for a grown woman. . .

May 6, 1926

As the year wore on, Isabel found herself doing lots of varied work, including, but not only, for Winter. She wrote Charles on May 6 that she:

had a business talk with my boss in which he urged me to give him as much of my time from now on as I intend to spend wage-earning. As you may have noticed, I am fairly casual about wage-earning. Just work enough to pay for my overhead and upkeep . . . and put in the rest of my time at more variegated pursuits, so that the sketchy character and excellent pay of the mural work will really suit me quite well. It will be only as permanent as I want it to be, which isn’t very, and as adaptable as I choose, and on my own terms.

She went on to say:

The gentleman has won some competitiveness for some ceilings, with much architectural detail, and also some historical panels. A lot of research work required for all this, which I can attend to while he is absent upstate . . . It seems like an excellent way for me to cash in on my very diversified artistic training and at the same time acquire a few dependable odds and ends of income, which seem necessary to me at present.

May 9, 1926

A little over a week later, she shared more on the Cornell murals:

Have been working very hard. There seems to be no end to these Cornell frescoes. Have been engaged for several days upon the foliage, as I were, of a truculent and pompous old phoenix who is to be strolling in the middle distance of the section representing ‘creative imagination.’ Other features of this group are a lady poet, a handsome sculptor, and a pondering mathematician, all pretty well draped in neo-Greek style without being really dressed, any of them. The boss is having some trouble adapting the mural-painter’s tradition of classical undrape to the needs of a co-educational institution full of mocking young persons.

And their continued to be parties at Winter’s studio. She added:

There is a big blow-out at the studio tonight, which I am wholly omitting. Crowds and crowds of people I don’t much fancy, and not one of them as stimulating on the spot as you, even at the end of an endless line of railway tracks.

May 18, 1926

She wrote about her techniques and the art of mural painting as well:

It [mural painting] will be a problem of continued adaptation of me and of art. And, Chass, I have been doing that for such ages. I invented and maintained standards of drawing techniques adapted to the needs of tropical research in the field, and worked out a graphic type of surgical chart. And of late I have been working hard for a man who doesn’t know what he wants until he sees it.

_____________

Isabel continued to work for Ezra Winter, including on his panels for the Birmingham Public Library well into 1927.

Work with Ezra Winter was a lark for Isabel, fun, challenging, interesting. And it helped pay the rent. She supported herself as a professional artist until she married Charles in August 1928.

References[+]

Bart Mahaffie Part II — Childhood and education

Previous post in this series: Bart Mahaffie Part I — Introduction

George Barton “Bart” Mahaffie was the second son and third child of George B. “Doc” Mahaffie and Mary Frances “Mollie” Williams Mahaffie. He was born October 3, 1889, in Olathe, Kansas. His parents were farmers. They also operated a store in Olathe.

Rose, Doc, Bart, Mollie, and Charles Mahaffie, 1891

The Mahaffie’s were a pioneering family. Bart’s grandfather, James Beatty Mahaffie, and grandmother, Lucinda Henderson Mahaffie homesteaded in Olathe, west of Kansas City, and kept a stagecoach stop there at the eastern end of the Santa Fe Trail from 1858 to 1870.

Bart Mahaffie at age 5

Doc and Mollie moved their family when Bart was three to a new homestead in Oklahoma Territory, joining the 1893 Cherokee Strip Land Run which opened Oklahoma lands taken from Native Americans to homesteaders.

During the Land Run, Doc galloped ahead on horseback with his brother Billy to try to secure the best land. Molly drove the team pulling a covered wagon, her three children, Rose, Charles, and Bart, and a household’s supplies aboard. They settled in Kingfisher, Oklahoma Territory. Another child, Oscar Beatty Mahaffie was born there.

Bart’s childhood home, Komalty, Oklahoma

In 1901, when Bart was 11 or 12, the family moved further west to Komalty in Kiowa County, near Hobart, in west-central Oklahoma Territory.

Hobart then was newly settled, with only a few businesses. There Doc raised wheat and livestock, becoming a prosperous rancher trading cattle and mules as far as Amarillo and Wichita.

Mollie ran a busy household and established herself as a community leader, prominent in Hobart’s civic affairs and social clubs. She was elected to the Hobart School Board, its first woman member, and served as School Board President from 1916 to 1919.

Mollie demanded that her children get the best education they could. In older age she said, “We were determined to educate our children if we never had a dollar.”

Before she married, she had taught school for nine years, starting at the age of 16, studying at a teacher’s college, called a normal school, in the summers. That focus on education was surely behind her daughter, Rose, being a school teacher and the fact that all four of her children attended college, two completing advanced degrees.

A little more about Hobart, the Komalty homestead, and Bart’s family is here.

“One of the most popular young men who ever lived in Hobart”

Teenaged Bart with sidearm about 1905

As Bart grew he learned ranching under his father’s tutelage and he got a good schooling under his mother’s direction. He grew to be a popular young member of the community.

Bart was a tall, handsome young man. He had blue eyes and dark hair. By high school, and surely before, he had distinguished himself as an athlete. He stood out, among other places, on the Hobart High School football team. After one game in 1905, the Hobart paper reported: “the sensational play of the game was made by Bart Mahaffie when Lee, Granite’s splendid left halfback, broke away and raced down the field for a touchdown, with a clear track before him excepting Bart, who made a flying tackle and saved Hobart from being scored against.”

High school graduation

Bart graduated from Hobart High School on Friday, May 18, 1906. The ceremony took place at the Presbyterian Church. There were a total of six graduates, most of whom spoke or performed at the ceremony. Bart’s part was to make a speech on the “Flight of the Bat”.

Bart (holding pennant) with his Kingfisher basketball teammates, between 1906-10

Higher education

Bart at Kingfisher College, between 1906-10

In the fall of 1906, Bart started at Kingfisher College where his older brother Charles had graduated in 1905. Over four years, he studied and played sports at Kingfisher, graduating with a bachelor’s degree in June 1910.

That fall, Bart began studying law at the University of Oklahoma in Norman. He was enrolled for two years, but did not take a degree. While studying in Norman, he joined Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity and played on the Sooners football team.

After college Bart tried his hand at various jobs. In 1911, he was in Hobart, working for a real estate firm. By 1912, he had gone to work in Dallas for U.S. Bond & Mortgage Co. He visited Hobart late that summer on his way to Oklahoma City, where he was being transferred by his company. Bart continued to work in Oklahoma City until at least April 1914. Likely it was that summer when he left for Colorado to homestead.

Seeing a path for himself

Bart came at last to see a path for himself: to be a stock man like his father, but his own boss with his own ranch.

American generations tended, in the 1800s, to move a state or more westward as each rose to adulthood. Westward meant land and it meant opportunity, a chance to make one’s own way. Families were large and the home place would only be more crowded, less able to support another adult and family.

The Mahaffie’s followed that path through their American generations; Bart Mahaffie’s great great grandfather crossing from Northern Ireland to Pennsylvania, his great grandfather from Pennsylvania to Ohio and then Indiana, his grandfather from Indiana to Kansas. Bart’s father, Doc, moved from Kansas to Oklahoma for new land. And now Bart was moving another state west for his own chance.

There was still land to be had, further west. The papers regularly wrote about Colorado, touting the opportunity to claim land and the state’s beauty and healthful climate. Colorado beckoned.

_________________

Later posts in this series: 

Bart Mahaffie Part III — To Colorado for land of his own

Bart Mahaffie Part IV — The flu reaches the 500 Ranch

Charles D. Mahaffie goes to Washington, 100 years ago

Charles D. Mahaffie
Charles D. Mahaffie, 1916: “A good mixer”

On Monday, September 18, 1916, Charles D. Mahaffie was sworn in as the Solicitor of the U.S. Department of the Interior. The Solicitor’s office provided legal services to the entire Department.

The Oregonian newspaper wrote, “Twenty-Six attorneys under his direction are today telling him what his duties are.” [Oregonian, September 19, 1916] He was now a Federal bureaucrat, serving a department now overseeing the brand-new National Park Service, and managing land issues including those involving Native Americans. The Solicitor would be a busy man.

Charles was 31, a graduate of Kingfisher College, Oklahoma and a Rhodes Scholar graduate of St. Johns College, Oxford. Still a bachelor, he moved his lodgings from the University Club, Portland, Oregon, to the University Club, Washington, DC, taking a residence with other single men in a club that had dining, commons spaces, and plenty of camaraderie. The Club was at 15th and I St., NW, on MacPherson Square.

Another paper said Mahaffie was a “bachelor and a tennis enthusiast” and a “public land specialist … much interested in the conservation of the natural resources of the country.” [The Oelwein Daily Register (Iowa), November 17, 1916]

2016-09-11-17-40-38Interior was a good fit for the talents and interest of this young man who as a toddler was in the Oklahoma Land Rush of 1889, was raised adjacent to Indian Territory, and was now steeped in matters of land use. [Note: those that remember him may struggle with the idea of Charles as a “toddler”.]

Charles had settled in Portland in 1911 to start a law practice. Over five years there, he had become enmeshed in city politics and other civic and professional activities. It’s likely, had he not been called to Washington by Woodrow Wilson, that he would have made his life in Portland, and perhaps entered elective politics there.

The sort of man he was
Three or four of Charles’ seven grandchildren are old enough to remember him as a gruff old man. In his marriage to Isabel Cooper, an energetic, creative, busy, people collector, he seemed just a quiet backdrop. But his younger adulthood as a bachelor, rising in Portland City politics, shows a different side.

Earlier that Summer, Charles’ Oxford alumnae magazine gave his perspective on Portland:

The report from Charlie Mahaffie, Oklahoma and St. John’s, glows with an optimism truly Pacific. “We’re strong here,” he says of Portland, Oregon, “for preparedness. Preparedness to welcome the ‘prosperity wave’ which we hear is now just east of the Cascade Mountains. We have sentries out to locate it. Otherwise the coast is very ‘Pacific’; and Wilson looks like a good bet in this part of it. Prohibition seems very effectual, and sociability speaks in a subdued tone. But we are getting used to it gradually, and if it does all that we were promised, everybody will be pleased.” [The American Oxonian, July 1916]

He complained about Prohibition. (Prohibition lasted from 1920 to 1933 for the U.S. overall. But Oregon had voted to ban all alcohol in 1915). He told The American Oxonian that it would create financial issues for the University Club. [The American Oxonian, January 1916]

Some other of Charles’ Portland activities

  • Served as assistant secretary of the Oregon Conservation Commission
  • Was advisory editor of the National Municipal Review, editing the department of Judicial Decisions Affecting Municipalities
  • Served as Director, Douglas County Fire Patrol Association
  • Served as Treasurer, Oregon Bar Association
  • Served as secretary, University Club, Portland
  • Played competitive tennis

Politics and opinion

Charles wrote an article in a Portland paper in favor of presidential candidate Woodrow Wilson, focusing on his brave reforms when President of Princeton. Charles had joined the faculty of Princeton University following his Oxford education, as an instructor in jurisprudence.

The issue in higher education as Charles reported it was, “so all-pervading has the craze for social honors become that the public itself wants to know of the recent graduate, not if he led his class or was a high honor man, but what fraternity or club he ‘made’.”

“Universities founded and supported for the purpose of preparing men for life in America were, consciously or unconsciously, coming to put the chief emphasis on matters destructive of the best ideals of American life. Most men not directly concerned saw the process with regret. Many of the keener academic authorities appreciated the danger by saw no effectual means of combating it. Woodrow Wilson was one of the first to diagnose the situation.”

Democracy and the Suffrage by Charles D. MahaffieAmong the steps Wilson had taken: eliminating fraternities and raising academic standards, despite strong pressures against those changes. [The Oregon Daily Journal [Portland], September 5, 1912]

Charles also authored and presented a paper, published also as a pamphlet, called “Democracy and the Suffrage,” [links to full article] supporting the vote for women. He wrote, “In no important line of human effort, except politics, is the sex of the thinker considered of importance in estimating the value of brain product.” [Charles D. Mahaffie, “Democracy and the Suffrage,” 1912.] Women’s voting rights were on the ballot that year in Oregon, and the referendum passed with 52% support. The United States didn’t give voting rights to women until 1920.

“New solicitor is called a good mixer”
The Day wrote about Charles under the headline “New Solicitor is Called Good Mixer”.

“Charles D. Mahaffie, of Portland, Ore., has arrived in Washington, DC. To take up his new duties as solicitor of the Interior Department. Both Senators Lane and Chamberlain of Oregon warmly urged the appointment of Mahaffie. He is popular throughout his native state, is known as a prominent attorney and is declared to be a good mixer.” [The Day, October 6, 1916]

Illustrating the story was the photo above, showing Charles, the good mixer suited, wearing a homburg, and striding along what might be Pennsylvania Avenue or F Street, in Washington.

“Mr. Mahaffie comes on from Washington Tues. midnight”

This entry is post 16 of 21 in the ongoing series Isabel Cooper
Dorothy Binney Putnam and Charles D. Mahaffie in May 1927
Dorothy Binney Putnam and Charles D. Mahaffie in May 1927

Dorothy Putnam wrote Isabel Cooper on December 20, 1924, inviting her to her Rye, New York home, and announcing that Mr. Mahaffie would be arriving that next Tuesday (December 23rd) at midnight. Mr. Mahaffie was clearly a topic of prior conversation. Isabel’s friend Dorothy, whom she called a “festive lady who loved people, giving parties, and matchmaking,” was determined that Isabel should meet Mr. Mahaffie.

Dorothy was to see Mr. Mahaffie in New York City on Wednesday, Christmas Eve, for lunch and a matinee. She urged Isabel to join them for the lunch and show, or at least join Charles and Dorothy to make the 5:35 pm train to Rye. Everyone was headed, ultimately, for a Christmas Eve party at the Putnams.

Isabel was a fascinating, adventuring young woman in the early 1920s, at the beginning of her thirties. And she was single. Hints in things she wrote later suggest tries at romance, but perhaps her exotic life as a scientific expedition artist, and perhaps also her temperament, left her unattached.

But Dorothy was inspired to match her great friend Isabel with her husband’s friend Charles Mahaffie. It’s hard to imagine why. Perhaps Dorothy fixed on the idea that opposites attract.

DBP to IC re CDM
Dorothy Putnam’s invitation to Isabel Cooper. A Red India ink outline was Isabel’s habitual way to highlight the signficant in old papers

Dorothy Binney Putnam was a daughter of Edwin Binney, who founded and co-owned Binney & Smith, Inc., the maker of Crayola crayons. She was married to George Palmer Putnam, a grandson of the founder of Putnam & Sons, the publishers. A few years later, George would drift to a new interest, Amelia Earhart, who fascinated him as a project–a woman aviator he could use to drive book sales–and as a lover. And Dorothy had her own affairs.

For at least a few years, Isabel and Dorothy were best friends. In 1925, Isabel wrote Charles from the Canal Zone, where she and Dorothy were together, “It is so nice to see her. I can’t get along without her for long, and her intelligence and lovableness and her knack of telling things so your diaphragm aches for hours with laughing.i

She said also, “Dorothy stands as a most excellent example of the sort of equable and valuable person I would like to be.”

Charles was forty, an established bachelor who lived with other unattached men in the University Club in downtown Washington, DC. He was a hard-working, Oklahoma-farm-raised Rhodes Scholar. A gruff government lawyer, working in the Federal Government’s Interstate Commerce Commission on the then-vital matters of railroad regulation.

The Putnams knew Charles from the 1910s in Portland, when George and Charles had both been connected to city politics and business affairs in the 1910s. But the Putnams had moved east for George to work in the family publishing business. They came to know Isabel from New York Society. Isabel and Charles were, separately, recurring visitors at the Putnam’s estate at Rye, New York.

George and Dorothy supposed that this mis-matched pair would take to each other. They arranged a Christmas holiday at Rye and invited Isabel and Charles.

So two people, world’s apart in temperament, background, and experience, got on a train for Rye on Tuesday, December 23, 1924.

Fifty or more years later, Isabel told me how she and Charles met before they were supposed to, on the train to Rye, so perhaps Dorothy didn’t take the same train after all. The two hit it off and realized they were the pair intended to meet at the Putnams. They got a laugh out George and Dorothy when they showed up at Rye, already acquainted. George, Isabel told me, remarked that since they’d already met, there was really no reason to go through with the festivities. But they spent at least a few days together as guests of the Putnams. And Dorothy’s matchmaking proved spot on.

“You do explode some grenades, you know”

ICM and CDM in Oct 1928
Isabel and Charles Mahaffie, 1928

Charles wrote Isabel when their acquaintance was only a few weeks old, “It was nice of you to come by yesterday. I’m glad to have had another chance to see you, even it it was for only a few minutes. You see, I’ve seldom seen anyone half so direct, downright, and stimulating a you, and I’ve liked having you wake me up a bit. You do explode some grenades, you know. Which comes, I suppose, from using an active brain as it was meant to be used. Altogether you are a most delightful person, and while Dorothy did not tie it up with nice Santa seals her introduction on December 24 was the nicest Christmas present I’ve had.ii

Charles and Isabel were married in August 1928. Isabel moved with Charles into an apartment in Washington and began a life very different from what she lived. She became a housewife and mother, though never typical at either. She continued her painting, soon forgoing paid work for doing art that pleased her. Her years of exploring the tropics were over.

___________________

i Letter, IC to CDM, from the Canal Zone, March 27, 1925.

ii Letter, CDM to IC, January 8, 1925.

Follow by Email
Instagram